Hey everyone, second day here and second post. This one I’ve gone back and forth on many times and I don’t believe there is a clear answer in my mind.
The situation: I bought a condo in San Jose, CA at age 25 with the plan of staying there for the foreseeable future. Fast forward just one year and I was moving to Texas and trying to offload the condo at a loss. Ended up not finding a buyer and keeping it for the past 6 months as an investment property with a tenant, looking to reassess after their lease ends.
Where I’m at today: After all ownership costs (mortgage, taxes, interest, management fee, HOA) I’m paying about $1,200 a month to cover the difference between rental income and the costs to keep the condo. About $650 of that is going towards the principle so that helps, and I know some other costs are tax deductible as a rental property.
The question: I don’t really want to keep the condo, but am willing to do so if it makes financial sense. Trying to decide between banking on Bay Area real estate historical prices and hoping that it will appreciate enough for me to make a nice chunk in the long run, while also hoping for rent rates increase over time so that I’m paying less out of pocket to keep it. On the other side of the coin is that I don’t really want to keep it and am essentially allocating $15K a year just to keep the thing in the mean time while banking on hypothetical future growth. So, to keep or sell?
Thanks!